Trump tweeted "Thank you", and the three intentions are obvious!

  On the 10th, the Supreme Leader of president, China delivered a keynote speech at the 2018 annual meeting of Boao Forum for Asia, proposing four important measures to further open to the outside world, which was widely praised and supported by the international community.

  Intriguingly, US President Trump immediately released a tweet, saying, "I am very grateful to the Chairman of the Supreme Leader for his friendly remarks on tariffs and automobile imports, and also thank him for his policy signals on intellectual property rights and technical exchanges. We will make greater progress together! "

  在对华挥舞贸易关税大棒的背景下,特朗普这则貌似示好的推文,显得颇不寻常。

  首先,这是特朗普迫于全球压力,不得不做出的姿态。

  最高领袖博鳌演讲发表之后,西方舆论掀起了解读热潮,普遍认为习主席宣布的进一步扩大开放的举措,真正展示出中国维护全球化的决心和诚意,再次展现了中国对世界的责任与担当。《纽约时报》指出,最高领袖的讲话与特朗普及其政府发出的好斗言论形成鲜明对比。美联社认为,最高领袖努力让中国扮演好世界贸易与合作的维护者角色,与特朗普高喊“美国优先”口号、对进口与贸易进行限制的做法迥异。

  时代大潮奔涌向前,保护主义不得人心。在中国成为全球自由贸易的捍卫者和多边贸易体系的维护者之际,美国政府不得不有所表示,挽回些颜面。

  其次,“感谢”中国实则想误导国际舆论。

  特朗普在推文中提及关税、汽车进口、知识产权等中国进一步对外开放的举措,并对此表示“感谢”,误导外界以为中方作出让步的意图非常明显,从而营造于己有利的舆论,想在两国贸易冲突中“抢分”。

  特朗普政府的短期思维无法理解中国的长期战略部署。对中国改革开放历史稍有了解的人都知道,40年来,从农村到城市,从试点到推广,从经济体制改革到全面深化改革,中国的改革开放,一直循着自己的国情踏实前行。习主席10日宣布的最新对外开放举措,早在中共十九大报告、中央经济工作会议和今年中国政府工作报告中透露出原则和方向,这是中国全面深化改革的既定战略安排。如果将其简单理解为是中方应对贸易战之招,那不是无知,就是故意混淆视听。

  第三,安抚美国市场,为国内政治服务。

  对特朗普政府而言,稳定美国资本市场、备战11月份中期选举、巩固共和党优势地位是当前头等大事。自美挑起对华贸易纷争以来,华尔街投资者如惊弓之鸟,美股经历多次过山车般的起伏,国会议员们、行业协会、企业代表、媒体和民众的指责纷至沓来。中方采取的精准、干脆、强硬的反击措施,令特朗普预先设计的攻势限于停滞。民主党当然会趁机“攻城略地”,试图在中期选举中争取多个支持共和党的州。美国媒体指出,特朗普正在将美国经济、自己的任期和共和党的执政前景,压在一场与中国进行贸易较量的豪赌上。

  In the face of chaos, Trump urgently needs to appease the public’s emotions and calm the voice of criticism. At this time, he expressed "thanks" to the supreme leader Boao’s speech, but in fact he wanted to send a message to China: the government’s strategy worked and China made concessions.

  Unfortunately, the American people don’t buy it. Some Republican senators pointed out that "Trump actually didn’t win." Axios, an American political online media, said that Trump’s arbitrariness and willfulness on the extremely serious topic of trade war had to make people more anxious about the prospect of Sino-US trade war, especially the prospect of the United States.

  The United States provoked trade disputes with China, which is an important part of its plan to maintain its hegemony by containing China’s development. Therefore, it is only a tactical means for the United States to contain China by sometimes talking harshly and sometimes softening its posture. In this regard, China has sufficient strategic strength to remain sober and cautious, listen to its words and deeds, not only will it continue to promote reform and opening up, but will also resolutely win this trade self-defense counterattack!

  (Author: Sheng Yuhong, international critical commentator)

People’s Daily client: Be alert! Foreign stereotyped writing prevails in four major fields

  Speaking of foreign stereotyped writing, many people will think of Mao Zedong’s words at the Sixth Plenary Session of the Sixth Central Committee of the Party in 1938: "Foreign stereotyped writing must be abolished, empty and abstract U-turns must be sung less, dogmatism must be rested, and it should be replaced by fresh and lively China style and China style that are loved by China people."

  Today’s "foreign stereotyped writing", although very different from the contents and forms of expression of that year, is equally harmful. Therefore, we must take a clear-cut stand against all foreign stereotyped writing.

  [Phenomenon]

  At present, many places not only regard whether a paper can be published in a foreign journal as a sign to measure whether it is excellent or not, but also consider that publishing a paper in a foreign journal can be equivalent to publishing several papers in a domestic core journal, and even take the number of papers published in a foreign journal and the grade of the journal as an important basis for evaluating professional titles, applying for funding and various awards.

  In many domestic universities and research institutions, due to the prevalence of "foreign stereotyped writing", some western theories almost dominate the world. Law, politics, sociology and other disciplines all face similar problems.

  [opinion]

  The "worshipping foreign things and obsessing foreign things" in the evaluation criteria and evaluation system is equivalent to handing over the right to speak, which not only enables western developed countries to easily take many outstanding scientific research achievements in China with their influential journals, but also allows western values to influence social science and even ideological theoretical research in China to a great extent, which will further endanger China’s cultural security, ideological security, and even threaten China’s political security and national security.

  [Phenomenon]

  In the eyes of many leaders and scholars in universities and research institutions, if you don’t quote several articles by western scholars as references, you won’t have an international perspective. Some universities, research institutions and academic journals even require that published papers and research results must have foreign language citations and notes. Looking at many academic journals, some papers are almost foreign languages written in Chinese characters and spoken in Chinese.

  [opinion]

  On the one hand, this phenomenon occurs because most social science scholars in China who went abroad after the reform and opening up came from studying western theories, and many of them simply copied western theories or painted cats like tigers; On the other hand, some domestic experts and scholars, out of fear of saying the wrong thing, making mistakes or belittling practice, often say some correct nonsense, boring big words and boring cliché s to so-called "interpret" and "exaggerate" the Party’s innovation theory, or explain some basic Marxist principles that could have been interpreted in a popular way with concepts or vocabulary that many people can’t understand, resulting in the reluctance or incomprehension of the broad masses of cadres and people in party member, and consciously or unconsciously ceded many ideological positions.

  [Phenomenon]

  Under the influence of "stereotyped foreign writing" thinking for many years, many universities and research institutions not only require candidates with high professional titles and academic leaders in important disciplines to have overseas study experience. When recruiting talents, many central state organs and local party and government organs also give priority to those with foreign university diplomas or overseas experience, and even prefer to introduce some graduates from foreign second-and third-rate universities rather than give local outstanding talents the same opportunities.

  [opinion]

  To completely eliminate the harm of stereotyped writing by foreigners, we must seriously consider how to thoroughly reform as soon as possible, resolutely abolish the absurd employment policy of giving priority to those with foreign university diplomas or overseas experience, attach importance to training and selecting cadres from the grassroots level, and even explore the selection of cadres from front-line workers and farmers. When selecting and employing people, we should not look at their origins and academic qualifications, but focus on their political stance and professional ability. For those with foreign university diplomas or overseas experience, we should examine their political stance more strictly, so as to truly treat local and overseas talents equally.

  [Phenomenon]

  More and more people feel that China’s cities have lost their characteristics. No matter whether they are megacities such as Beijing or Shanghai, or many large and medium-sized cities, they are more and more similar. This is because most of their important buildings are designed by foreign architects, and almost all of them cost a lot of money. Although the works of these foreign architects in China have attracted many questions, and some of them have even been spoofed and ridiculed, many places are still keen to invite foreign architects to design their city’s landmark buildings. Admittedly, there are excellent works designed by foreign architects, but an important reason for the above situation is probably the "stereotyped foreign writing" thinking of some leading cadres when making decisions.

  [opinion]

  Influenced by stereotyped writing in foreign countries, some leading cadres are unclear about right and wrong when facing many issues of right and wrong. When making decisions, they often take "whether the West agrees or not, whether the West is satisfied or not" as the standard, instead of first considering whether the people agree or not, whether they are satisfied or not, which not only causes great ideological confusion, but also brings great losses to the party and the country.

  When making decisions, we must pay attention to the actual national conditions and resolutely oppose blindly westernization. The practice of some leading cadres who are divorced from the national conditions and superstitious about the West when making decisions should be stopped in time, and the wrong policies and measures that have been introduced should be stopped as soon as possible and resolutely corrected. For foreign things, we should adhere to the principle of making foreign things serve China, removing the rough and the fine, discarding the false and retaining the true, and making them work for our own use after scientific sublation. This is a scientific principle that must be adhered to while opposing "stereotyped foreign writing", and it is also a correct principle that should be followed when making any decision.

  (Excerpted from Red Flag Manuscript, No.15, 2014, "Opposing stereotyped foreign writing has become a top priority". Editor: Dong Yu)

    Reprinted from the People’s Daily client